Yhteenveto blogin vuodesta 2010

WordPress lähetti lyhyen yhteenvetoraportin tämän blogin tapahtumista vuonna 2010. Tältä se näyttää:


Your 2010 year in blogging


The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Wow.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

About 3 million people visit the Taj Mahal every year. This blog was viewed about 53,000 times in 2010. If it were the Taj Mahal, it would take about 6 days for that many people to see it.


In 2010, there were 90 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 232 posts. There were 131 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 6mb. That’s about 3 pictures per week.

The busiest day of the year was June 7th with 1,253 views. The most popular post that day was Greenpeace valehtelee ydinvoiman vaaroista.


Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were tuukkasimonen.blogspot.com, facebook.com, oikotieto.fi, co2-raportti.fi, and tiede.fi.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for kaj luukko, gaia blogi, hannu tanskanen, lämpötilatilastot, and gaia.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.


Greenpeace valehtelee ydinvoiman vaaroista June 2010


Data July 2009


Ilmastohuijaus on täyttä totta! December 2009


Mikä on Gaia? February 2008


Vihreiden ydinvoimasekoilu jatkuu, nyt vuorossa uraanikaivokset November 2010


2 ajatusta artikkelista “Yhteenveto blogin vuodesta 2010

  1. Moi ja hyvää uutta vuotta kaikille! Tässä Roy Spencerin tekstiä hänen blogistaan 3.1.2011 – ihan näin hyvien naurujen vuoksi.

    But what DOES exist is a large organization that has a virtual monopoly on global warming research in the U.S., and that has a vested interest in AGW theory being true: the U.S. Government. The idea that government-funded climate research is unbiased is laughable. The push for ever increasing levels of government regulation and legislation, the desire of government managers to grow their programs, the dependence of congressional funding of a problem on the existence of a “problem” to begin with, and the U.N.’s desire to find reasons to move toward global governance, all lead to inherent bias in climate research.

    At least with medical research, there will always be funding because disease will always exist. But human-caused warming could end up to be little more than a false alarm…as well as a black eye for the climate research community. And lest we forget, possibly the biggest funding-related source of bias in climate research is that research community of scientists. Everyone knows that if the AGW “problem” is no longer a problem, their source of research funding will disappear.

    Sometimes I get accused of being a conspiracy nut for believing these things. Well, whoever accuses me of that has obviously not worked in government or spent much time dealing with program managers in Washington. There is no conspiracy, because these things are not done in secret. The U.N.’s Agenda 21 is there for all to read.



Täytä tietosi alle tai klikkaa kuvaketta kirjautuaksesi sisään:


Olet kommentoimassa WordPress.com -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )

Google+ photo

Olet kommentoimassa Google+ -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )


Olet kommentoimassa Twitter -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )


Olet kommentoimassa Facebook -tilin nimissä. Log Out /  Muuta )


Muodostetaan yhteyttä palveluun %s